Skip to main content
. 2015 May 9;15:380. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1369-8

Table 1.

Correlation between KPNA2 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics of UTUC patients after RNU

KPNA2 immunoreactivity
Variable Case No. Low (N = 101) High (N = 75) P *
Sex 0.038
  Male 78 48 30
  Female 98 53 45
Age (y) 0.95
  ≥70 84 48 36
  <70 92 53 39
BMI (kg/m2) 0.26
  >27 37 24 13
  27-22 81 46 35
  <22 58 31 27
Tumor size (cm) 0.46
  ≥3.5 81 41 40
  <3.5 95 60 35
T stage <0.001
  Ta-T1 61 48 13
  T2 70 36 34
  T3 42 17 25
  T4 3 0 3
Pathologic lymph node stage 0.25
  N0 168 98 70
  N+ 8 3 5
G grade <0.001
  G1 3 3 0
  G2 105 77 28
  G3 68 21 47
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)# 0.83
  ≥60 77 48 29
  60-15 90 49 41
  <15 9 4 5
Hydronephrosis 0.24
  Absent 70 46 24
  Present 106 65 41
Location 0.30
81 50 31
  Renal pelvis Proximal 6 5 1
  Middle 17 9 8
  Distal ureter 52 26 26
  Multiple 20 11 9
Side 0.95
  Left 82 49 33
  Right 94 52 42
Tumor multiplicity 0.99
  Single tumor focus 121 69 52
  Multiple tumor foci 55 32 23
Tumor configuration 0.53
  Papillary 140 82 58
  Nonpapillary 36 19 17

*Mann–Whitney test for the comparison between two groups or Kruskal-Wallis test for more than two groups.

# Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the re-expressed Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas for the Chinese population.