. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: Matern Child Health J. 2015 May;19(5):1078–1086. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1608-7

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and group mean differences of study variables

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1. Mothers’ depressive symptoms 4 years	–
2. Mothers’ depressive symptoms 9 mo	.42^*	–
3. Fathers’ depressive symptoms 9 mo	.16^*	.23^*	–
4. Fathers’ literacy inv. 9 mo	−.02	−.04^*	−.06^*	–
5. Fathers’ play inv. 9 mo	.00	−.03	−.06^*	.75^*	–
6. Fathers’ routine care. inv. 9 mo	.05^*	.05^*	−.01	.27^*	.42^*	–
7. Fathers’ responsive care. inv. 9 mo	.03	.03	−.04^*	.29^*	.37^*	.52^*	–
8. SES quintile 9 mo	−.15^*	−.13^*	−.09^*	.02	−.05^*	−.04^*	−.11^*	–
9. Mothers’ age	−.05^*	−.07^*	−.06^*	−.02	−.06^*	−.03^*	−.04^*	.39^*	–
10. Child is caucasian, non-latino (a)	−.04^*	−.05^*	−.03	.00	−.03	.00	−.20^*	.19^*	.08^*	–
TYP M	4.31	4.07	3.10	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	3.39	29.1	61 %
TYP SD	4.96	4.58	3.76	1.04	1.20	3.67	1.79	1.34	5.48
CWD M	4.42	4.42	3.69	−0.03	0.00	−0.35	−0.21	3.52	28.8	75 %
CWD SD	5.60	5.34	5.09	1.25	1.22	4.04	1.81	1.47	6.56
ASD M	5.49	5.84	7.05	0.12	0.00	0.04	0.90	3.62	31.8	60 %
ASD SD	3.87	6.37	8.41	0.98	1.75	3.89	2.24	1.22	4.81
CWD M versus TYP M			> ^*		^a		< ^†			> ^*
ASD M versus TYP M			> ^†		^a				> ^*
ASD M versus CWD M					^a		> ^†		> ^*

^†

p <.10

p <.05

Because only weak measurement invariance was achieved for play involvement, it was not appropriate to analyze mean comparisons