Skip to main content
. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0126671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126671

Table 1. Criteria considered in selecting the Community–based studies.

Criteria Justification
Number of fieldworkers Selected studies with more than one FW to be able to cross check information across different respondents, minimise responder bias—the tendency to respond desirably and explore FWs dynamics in a team
Where FWs were based Studies with community-based FWs selected to
enable exploration of how social embeddedness of FWs might influence research participation
Participants would easily understand who FWs are, as opposed to ward-based FWs who may be mistaken for doctors
Amount of interaction with participants Selected on-going studies with considerable FW-participant interaction to minimise recall bias, and to learn nature of those interactions
studies involving different amounts of interactions i.e. entire household, vs an individual participants
studies at different stages of the research cycle as likely to affect nature of interactions
Sensitivity of procedure or information and levels of benefits sensitivities around study procedures likely to impact on amount of time taken, range of issues FWs encountered, and nature of relationship between FWs and the participants
selected studies with different study procedures which are considered sensitive (e.g. included blood/nasal swabbing/vaccine)