Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 20;22(1):155–165. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002768

Table 4:

Average accuracy estimates of the SVM models for identifying pulmonary embolism (PE)

Average estimates (95% CI)
SVM models Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV AUC
Unigram only, linear kernel, no tuning 0.51 (0.34 to 0.68) 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) 0.75 (0.62 to 0.88) 0.96 (0.95 to 0.98) 0.92 (0.87 to 0.96)
Unigram only, RBF kernel, no tuning 0.39 (0.32 to 0.46) 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99) 0.63 (0.45 to 0.81) 0.95 (0.94 to 0.96) 0.93 (0.92 to 0.95)
Unigram only, linear kernel, with tuning 0.53 (0.36 to 0.70) 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99) 0.75 (0.65 to 0.85) 0.96 (0.94 to 0.98) 0.92 (0.88 to 0.96)
Unigram only, RBF kernel, with tuning 0.55 (0.42 to 0.67) 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99) 0.70 (0.54 to 0.86) 0.96 (0.95 to 0.98) 0.95 (0.93 to 0.97)
Uni + bigrams, linear kernel, no tuning 0.60 (0.45 to 0.75) 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) 0.85 (0.77 to 0.93) 0.97 (0.95 to 0.98) 0.95 (0.90 to 1.00)
Uni + bigrams, RBF kernel, no tuning 0.40 (0.33 to 0.47) 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99) 0.67 (0.51 to 0.83) 0.95 (0.94 to 0.96) 0.95 (0.93 to 0.96)
Uni + bigrams, linear kernel, tuning 0.61 (0.46 to 0.76) 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) 0.84 (0.76 to 0.92) 0.97 (0.95 to 0.98) 0.95 (0.90 to 1.00)
Uni + bigrams, RBF kernel, tuning 0.66 (0.49 to 0.83) 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) 0.80 (0.68 to 0.93) 0.97 (0.96 to 0.99) 0.96 (0.92 to 1.00)
Uni + bigrams, linear kernel, tuning, all features 0.78 (0.72 to 0.85) 0.99 (0.98 to 0.99) 0.84 (0.76 to 0.91) 0.98 (0.98 to 0.99) 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00)
Uni + bigrams, RBF kernel, tuning, all features 0.79 (0.73 to 0.85) 0.99 (0.98 to 0.99) 0.84 (0.75 to 0.92) 0.98 (0.98 to 0.99) 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00)*

Bold typeface is used to highlight the characteristics of the best performing SVM model. *p<0.001; statistically significant difference in performance compared to alternative SVM models.

Statistically significantly different compared to the best performing SVM model (i.e., Uni + bigrams, RBF kernel, tuning, all features).

Averages correspond to the mean accuracy estimates obtained after 10 rounds of cross-validation.

AUC, area under the curve; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; RBF, radial basis function kernel; SVM, support vector machine.