Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Healthc Mater. 2015 Feb 18;4(7):1084–1091. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201400783

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Representative images of hydrogel treated wounds over the course of the study. Wound area was manually measured (n = 4 – 5) and reported as a percentage with respect to the wound area at t = 0 (B, triangles = n-pore, squares = 60 μm, circles = 100 μm porous hydrogels). Wound closure measurements of wounds with pDNA loaded hydrogels showed significant differences between porous and n-pore hydrogels. Direct comparison of wound closure at day 8 (C) and 14 (D). Times correspond to initial onset of closure and end of study, respectively.