Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 May-Jun;39(3):373–382. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000212

TABLE 2.

Summary of ratios of CT perfusion parameters (subsampled/reference) estimated using mixed-effects modeling. Interval and point estimates for the mean ratios (subsampled/reference) are provided for each CT perfusion parameter, in tumor and normal liver. A ratio >1 indicates subsampled results were larger than reference. Boldface values represent statistically significant differences after adjusting for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni’s correction.

Tumor Normal Liver

Parameter Sampling
Interval
Mean
Ratio
99% Confidence
Interval
P-value Mean
Ratio
99% Confidence
Interval
P-value
BF 1s 1.06 1.02 – 1.12 0.0009 1.03 0.99 – 1.07 0.10
2s 1.31 1.22 – 1.40 <0.0001 1.28 1.22 – 1.34 <0.0001
3s 1.47 1.32 – 1.64 <0.0001 1.46 1.35 – 1.58 <0.0001
4s 1.63 1.44 – 1.84 <0.0001 1.64 1.47 – 1.82 <0.0001
BV 1s 0.99 0.96 – 1.03 0.71 0.98 0.96 – 1.01 0.10 [0.19*]
2s 1.10 1.06 – 1.15 <0.0001 1.03 0.99 – 1.07 0.05 [0.13*]
3s 1.20 1.13 – 1.27 <0.0001 1.09 0.97 – 1.21 0.06 [0.10*]
4s 1.29 1.18 – 1.41 <0.0001 1.13 0.98 – 1.29 0.03 [0.05*]
MTT 1s 0.93 0.91 – 0.94 <0.0001 0.96 0.94 – 0.98 <0.0001
2s 0.82 0.78 – 0.87 <0.0001 0.83 0.80 – 0.87 <0.0001
3s 0.77 0.71 – 0.83 <0.0001 0.76 0.72 – 0.80 <0.0001
4s 0.71 0.65 – 0.78 <0.0001 0.70 0.65 – 0.75 <0.0001
PS 1s 0.97 0.95 – 0.99 0.0002 0.98 0.97 – 0.99 0.0002
2s 0.94 0.91 – 0.96 <0.0001 0.91 0.89 – 0.93 <0.0001
3s 0.90 0.87 – 0.94 <0.0001 0.85 0.82 – 0.88 <0.0001
4s 0.86 0.82 – 0.91 <0.0001 0.80 0.76 – 0.84 <0.0001
HAF 1s 0.99 0.96 – 1.02 0.52 1.09 1.04 – 1.13 <0.0001
2s 0.93 0.89 – 0.97 <0.0001 1.23 1.05 – 1.43 0.0012
3s 0.89 0.82 – 0.96 0.0003 1.34 1.05 – 1.72 0.0028
4s 0.87 0.80 – 0.94 <0.0001 1.49 1.10 – 2.03 0.0011
*

p-values resulting from robust estimation (as described in Statistical analysis).