Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicol Lett. 2015 Apr 29;236(1):69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.04.013

Table 3.

Parameter estimates showing effects of BLL, sex, and BLL × sex on novel odor exploration in C57BL/6J mice, controlling for litter (as a random effect).

Significant Type III Fixed Effect Solutions for Fixed Effects
F p Est SE DF t value p
Training Phase Intercept* 0.50 0.03 28 15.96 <0.01
Discrimination Ratio
BLL 1.31 0.26 BLL 0.01 0.01 28 1.13 0.27
Sex 3.50 0.07 Sex male 0.08 0.04 28 1.87 0.07
BLL × Sex 0.57 0.46 Sex female 0 . . . .
BLL × Sex male interaction −0.01 0.01 28 −0.75 0.48
BLL × Sex female interaction 0 . . .

Testing Phase Intercept* 0.51 0.07 28 7.48 <0.01
Discrimination Ratio
BLL 0.37 0.58 BLL 0.01 0.01 28 0.58 0.23
Sex 1.04 0.32 Sex male 0.05 0.09 28 0.62 0.32
BLL × Sex 7.16 0.01 Sex female 0 . . . .
BLL × Sex male interaction −0.04 0.01 28 −2.68 0.01
BLL × Sex female interaction 0 . . . .

Training Phase Intercept* 42.2 13.97 28 3.17 <0.01
Total Odor Exploration (s) 0
BLL 0.45 0.51 BLL 1.57 1.37 28 1.41 0.26
Sex 0.20 0.65 Sex male −3.65 8.07 28 −0.69 0.65
BLL × Sex 1.74 0.20 Sex female 0 . . . .
BLL × Sex male interaction −1.69 1.28 28 −1.36 0.20
BLL × Sex female interaction 0 . . . .

Testing Phase Intercept* 7.25 1.51 28 4.81 <0.01
Total Odor Exploration (s)
BLL 0.11 0.74 BLL 0.01 0.27 28 0.02 0.99
Sex 0.07 0.80 Sex male 0.50 1.93 28 0.26 0.80
BLL × Sex 0.13 0.72 Sex female 0 . . . .
BLL × Sex male interaction −0.11 0.32 28 −0.37 0.72
BLL × Sex female interaction 0 . . . .
*

BLL values were centered for these analyses and the intercepts are directly interpretable.