Table 1.
Reference | Study design (participants) | Acupoints | Implementation of acupuncture | Key efficacy results | Adverse reactions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wu et al., 2014 [14] | RCT (n = 104) adult |
ST25, BL25, LI11, ST37 | EA1: ST25, BL25 EA2: LI11, ST37 EA3: ST25, BL25, LI11, ST37 C: Mosapride citrate |
Weekly frequency of defecation, defecation difficulty life, and quality score were all improved significantly in the four groups; in follow-up, weekly frequency of defecation of LI11 and ST37 (EA2) was superior to the other three groups | NA |
| |||||
Zhang et al., 2013 [15] | RCT (n = 553) adult |
ST25, ST37, ST36, BL25, TE6 | EA: 2 Hz/200 Hz D: Fuzhengliqi mixture EA + D: both of above C: Mosapride and Macrogol 4000 |
All groups decreased the defecation interval, stool property, constipation symptom grade, accompanying symptom grade, and GITT; EA + D was better than others; EA could keep long-term effect | No |
| |||||
Peng et al., 2013 [16] | RCT (n = 128) adult |
ST25 | EA-deep: 20 to 65 mm in depth EA-shallow: 5–8 mm depth D: lactulose oral liquid |
All groups increased the weekly defecation frequency; EA-deep could keep long-term effect | No |
| |||||
Chen et al., 2013 [17] | RCT (n = NA) adult female |
ST36, ST37, ST25, ST28, CV4, CV6 | EA Sham-EA |
EA improved constipation symptoms and increased autonomic nervous system activities, sham-EA not | NA |
| |||||
Zhou et al., 2012 [18] | RCT (n = 200) elder |
AT3, 4i, AT3, AT4, CO7, CO17, AH8, CO18, Constipation Point | AT: according to the pattern/syndrome differentiation C: solid points |
The effective rate: AT 92.0%, C 76.0% | NA |
| |||||
Xu et al., 2012 [19] | RCT (n = 64) adult |
TE6, ST25, ST36, ST37 | EA: Hwato neuro and muscle stimulator C: regular electronic stimulator |
The effective rate of short term: EA 54.6%, C 29.0% | NA |
| |||||
Anders et al., 2012 [20] | Retrospective case series study (n = 10) children |
Quchi (LI11) | Fixed indwelling acupuncture needles (0.9 mm in length) | After a median of 3 days of HIC, all children defecated within 2 h. Local constipation therapy was not required | No |
| |||||
L.-J. Wang and L.-L. Wang, 2011 [21] | RCT (n = 100) adult |
Group 1: ST25, SP15, CV6, CV4, ST36, ST37, SP6. Group 2: BL33, BL34, BL5, BL23, BL20 Alternatively | HA: punctured by hands HA + moxibustion: grain-shaped moxibustion was given at CV6, ST36, BL25, BL20, and others with puncture |
The total effective rate: HA + moxibustion as 74.0% (37/50) versus 52.0% (26/50) | NA |
| |||||
Guo et al., 2011 [22] | RCT (n = 378) adult |
ST25, ST37, ST36, BL25, TE6 | EA: 2 Hz/100 Hz D: Plantain and Senna Granule EA + D: both of the above |
All groups decreased the scores of defecation cycle, stool property, constipation symptom grade, accompanying symptom grade, and GITT; EA + D was better than others; EA and EA + D could keep long-term effect | No |
| |||||
Wang et al., 2010 [23] | RCT (n = 95) adult |
ST25 | EA-deep: 45 mm in depth EA-shallow: 5 mm in depth D: lactulose oral liquid |
EA-deep and EA-shadow were significantly superior to D group in increasing number up to 4 and improved CCS. EA-deep worked faster than EA-shadow | NA |
| |||||
Wang et al., 2010 [24] | RCT (n = 95) adult |
ST25 | EA-deep EA-shallow D: Duphalac |
EA-deep was similar to EA-shallow in number up to 4 and CCS, and its efficacy remained much longer | NA |
| |||||
Jin et al., 2010 [25] | Before-after study (n = 90) adult |
Group 1: ST25, CV6, ST37; Group 2: BL33, BL34, BL25 Alternatively | EA: BL33, BL34, ST25, T37 | The scores of defecation frequency, difficulty degree of defecation, defecation time, endless sensation of defecation, stool quality, awareness of defecation, and QoL were obviously improved after treatment. The total effective rate was 67.7% (61/90) | NA |
| |||||
Ding et al., 2009 [26] | Before-after study (n = 30) adult |
Group 1: ST25, SP15, SP14, CV6, CV4, ST36, ST37; Group 2: BL25, BL23, BL31, BL32, BL33, BL34, Ex-HN1 Alternatively | Deep needling was applied on acupoints of abdominal and back region and moxibustion was put on Ex-HN1 | Reduced laxative, scores for awareness, and QoL. Increased frequency of defecation | No |
| |||||
Zhang et al., 2007 [27] | RCT EA SA |
TE6 | EA: EA at Zhigou SA: EA at nonacupoint |
EA could obviously improve CCS and CTT, decrease cathartics, effective rate of 94.4% | No |
| |||||
Zhu et al., 2003 [28] | Before-after study (n = 188) adult |
ST25, ST36, ST37, BL25, BL57 | HA | Total effective rate of 100% | NA |
| |||||
Broide et al., 2001 [29] |
CCT-self (n = 17) child |
NA | Treated by five weekly placebo acupuncture sessions, followed by 10 weekly true acupuncture sessions | The frequency of bowel movements increased only after 10 true acupuncture sessions | NA |
| |||||
Klauser et al., 1993 [30] | CCT-self (n = 8) adult |
LI4, ST25, LE3, BL25 | EA: 10 Hz | Stool frequencies and CCT were not altered | Two patients dropped out because symptoms worsened |
RCT: randomized controlled trial; CCT: controlled clinical trial; HA: hand-acupuncture; EA: EA; AT: auriculotherapy; SA: sham acupuncture; D: drug; HA + D: hand-acupuncture + drug; EA + D: EA + drug; C: control; PE: patient's endurance; MA: mean age; PO: by mouth; CCS: Cleveland Constipation Score; number up to 4: the number of constipation patients whose defecation was up to 4 times per week; BMs, bowel movements; GITT: gastrointestinal transit time; TGITT: total gastrointestinal transit time; M-ITT: mouth-intestine transit time, CTT: colonic transit time; RCTT: right colonic transit time; LCTT: left colonic transit time; RSTT: rectosigmoid colonic transit time; MTL: motilin; QoL: quality of life; CI: confidence interval; QD, every day; BID: twice per day; TID: triple per day; NA: not acquirable.