Table 2.
Previous reports of RP in RTRs.
| References | n patients | RP | PLND | bNED | Follow-up (months) | Graft injury |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [16] | 1 | RRP | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| [15] | 3 | RRP | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| [18] | 2 | RRP | ? | No data | 0 | |
| [14] | 1 | RRP | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| [8] | 9 | RRP | 8 | 0 | ||
| [19] | 2 | RRP | 0 | No data | 0 | |
| [7] | 9 | RRP | 6 | 6 | 0 | |
| [20] | 16 | RRP | 0 | 16 | 25 | 0 |
| [21] | 9 | RRP | 0 | 9 | 13 | 0 |
| [11] | 20 | RRP | 0 | – | 2† | |
| [22] | 9 | RRP | 0 | 8 | 58 | 0 |
| Present | 16 | RRP | 16 | 16 | 48 | 0 |
| 7 | RPP | 0 | 7 | 39 | 0 | |
| [17] | 2 | RPP | 1 | No data | 0 | |
| [13] | 7 | RPP | 0 | 6 | 22 | 0 |
| [23] | 9 | Laparoscopic | 0 | 9 | 0⁎ | |
| [24] | 2 | Laparoscopic | 0 | 2 | 24 & 36 | 0 |
| [25] | 3 | Laparoscopic | 0 | 3 | ||
| [26] | 1 | Laparoscopic | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| [12] | 1 | laparoscopic | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| [27] | 3 | RALP | 0 | 3 | 13 | 0 |
| [28] | 1 | RALP | 0 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
| Total, n (%) | 133 | – | 27 (20) | 94% | 2 (1.5) |
⁎
Significantly greater frequency of rectal injury vs. non-RTR (22% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.022); RALP, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; bNED, no evidence of biological recurrence.
†
Two ureteric injuries, significantly greater rate of systemic bacterial infections vs. non-RTR (15% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.01);