Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 14;13(38):5133–5138. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i38.5133

Table 2.

Comparison of clinicopathological features between patients with and without lymph node metastasis

Factors Node negative Node positive P value
Dissected nodes (mean ± SD) 19.3 ± 7.5 20.8 ± 6.9 0.188
Age, yr (mean ± SD) 53.9 ± 12.1 52.9 ± 13.2 0.606
Tumor maximum diameter (cm, mean ± SD) 3.1 ± 1.8 3.5 ± 1.8 0.197
Gender
Male 209 33
Female 66 14 0.465
Tumor location
Upper 11 0
Middle 53 9
Lower 207 38 0.435
Total 4 0
Depth of invasion
Mucosa 143 9
Submucosa 132 38 < 0.001
Histological type
Differentiated 130 12
Undifferentiated 145 35 0.007
Macroscopic type
Protruded 18 3
Flat 34 4 0.746
Depressed 223 40
Growth manner
Mass 87 15
Nest 79 12 0.891
Diffuse 109 20
lymphatic invasion
Negative 267 36
Positive 8 11 < 0.001

Differentiated: Papillary and tubular adenocarcinoma; Undifferentiated: Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma; Protruded:IandIIa; flat: IIb; depressed:IIc and III.