Skip to main content
. 2015 May 18;5:9827. doi: 10.1038/srep09827

Figure 4. Presence of a crystalline displacement field: numerical studies.

Figure 4

Estimation of the expected diffraction patterns calculated for different 3D strained crystals with shape similar to the SOI structure. (a) Common 3D iso-surface rendering of the synthetic object together with the incoming beam shape (FWHM of intensity) for Inline graphic. The laboratory frame is given; the length of the black lines is 100 nm. (b) Three synthetic models, corresponding to three different strain states and their corresponding diffraction patterns. The 2D sample description is shown in the plane indicated in (a) while the diffraction patterns are taken at the same Inline graphic and Inline graphic values as the ones of (Figure 2, left column). (c) Intensity integrated along the Inline graphic direction, for the same Inline graphic value. The specific features of the calculated diffraction patterns are emphasized by the white arrows and the dotted ellipse. The three strain states are as followed: (Left) The 3D strain-free crystal case. A 2D cut through the 3D amplitude is shown in (a). Note the assymetry in the spatial scale, which is underlined by the white lines, representing a 100 nm length. (Middle) Same calculation, obtained for a strained crystal: a displacement field with a radial symmetry is introduced at the edge of the structure. A 2D cut through the corresponding sample phase is shown at the top. (Right) Same as before with the simultaneous introduction of the displacement field at the edges and at the interface. This last model produces diffraction patterns in good agreement with the experimental ones.