Skip to main content
. 2015 May 13;7:257–266. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S83932

Table 5.

Effectiveness according to the validated algorithm

All
(n=1,090)
SC
(n=785)
IV
(n=305)
P-value
IV versus SC
ETN
(n=440)
ADA
(n=345)
P-value
ETN versus ADA
IFX
(n=201)
P-value
ETN versus IFX
ABA
(n=104)
P-value
ETN versus ABA
Effectiveness, % patients 32.2 35.9 22.6 <0.001 36.4 35.4 0.77 21.9 <0.001 24.0 0.02
Reasons for deeming therapy not effective, % patients
 Low adherence 51.4 50.2 54.4 0.21 50.5 49.9 0.87 49.8 0.87 63.5 0.02
 Increased biologic dose 10.1 3.2 27.9 <0.001 0.5 6.7 <0.001 38.8 <0.001 6.7 <0.001
 Biologic switch 18.4 18.7 17.7 0.70 19.1 18.3 0.77 18.9 0.96 15.4 0.38
 New DMARD 15.4 16.4 12.8 0.13 15.2 18.0 0.30 12.4 0.35 13.5 0.65
 Increase in glucocorticoid dose 11.7 12.1 10.5 0.46 13.0 11.0 0.41 10.0 0.28 11.5 0.70
 Multiple joint injections 7.8 6.2 11.8 0.002 6.4 6.1 0.87 9.5 0.16 16.4 <0.001

Note: Values are presented as percent of patients or P-value.

Abbreviations: ABA, abatacept; ADA, adalimumab; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; ETN, etanercept; IFX, infliximab; IV, intravenous; SC, subcutaneous.