Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 19;15(3):6633–6651. doi: 10.3390/s150306633

Table 2.

Quantitative performance of the proposed and three state-of-the-art dehazing methods in the sense of both contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the measure of enhancement (ME).

Input Image Dehazing Method CNR ME
graphic file with name sensors-15-06633t1.jpg Haze Image 53.0588 -
He's Method [1] 68.8744 15.8156
Fattal's Method [14] 71.8029 18.7441
Tan's Method [15] 84.9931 31.9343
Proposed Method 72.4338 19.3750
graphic file with name sensors-15-06633t2.jpg Haze Image 58.8830 -
He's Method [1] 72.8756 13.9626
Fattal's Method [14] 67.5625 8.6795
Tan's Method [15] 88.5869 29.7039
Proposed Method 81.4254 22.5424