Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011 Mar;35(1):81–89. doi: 10.1177/0309364610394476

Figure 7. a–c. Shape differences between sockets and models.

Figure 7

The sockets compared to the positives models were smaller over the anterior crest of the tibia and the fibular head than elsewhere. (a) model 1A; (b) model 1B; and (c) model 1C. Similar patterns were measured for companies 2, 3, 6, and 9, though the magnitude of the radial differences varied among the companies.