Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011 Mar;35(1):81–89. doi: 10.1177/0309364610394476

TABLE 1.

Performance results for all models.

Company
Number
Model ΔVolume
Model-AAOP
AAOP
(%)
Radius

% age of points within
±1.00mm of AAOP design
Radius

Min error
(mm)
Radius

Max error
(mm)
Radius

Mean error
(mm)
Radius
s.d. of mean
error
(mm)
PT diameter
Difference
Model-AAOP
(mm)
1 A 0.4 89 −3.1 5.1 0.0 0.7 3.6
1 B −0.4 91 −4.8 7.7 −0.1 0.8 6.3
1 C −0.4 91 −3.5 8.5 −0.1 0.8 3.4

2 A 0.6 89 −2.7 5.8 0.1 0.7 3.1
2 B −0.3 93 −5.3 6.9 −0.1 0.7 1.8
2 C 0.1 96 −2.5 6.1 0.0 0.5 1.5

3 A −1.1 85 −2.3 7.2 −0.3 0.8 2.9
3 B −1.3 81 −4.8 4.5 −0.4 0.7 3.0
3 C −1.2 88 −2.7 7.5 −0.3 0.7 1.9

4 A 0.8 86 −4.9 5.5 0.1 0.8 2.6
4 B 0.7 87 −6.5 8.3 0.2 0.9 8.8
4 C 1.3 91 −1.9 5.7 0.3 0.6 2.3

5 A −0.8 68 −4.2 8.5 −0.3 1.2 3.6
5 B −1.2 80 −4.7 11.7 −0.4 1.1 7.2
5 C −10.6 40 −26.3 6.3 −2.4 5.0 −11.8

6 A −0.1 90 −3.0 6.6 −0.1 0.7 3.4
6 B −1.1 85 −5.7 8.0 −0.4 0.9 4.6
6 C −0.9 92 −3.7 8.9 −0.2 0.7 2.2

7 A 0.0 86 −2.5 9.7 −0.1 0.9 2.9
7 B −0.8 76 −7.1 9.8 −0.3 1.1 4.4
7 C −0.9 90 −2.5 8.5 −0.3 0.7 2.1

8 A −3.7 39 −4.3 11.8 −1.0 1.4 2.1
8 B −1.7 78 −4.0 7.2 −0.5 0.8 2.2
8 C −1.9 78 −3.8 11.0 −0.5 0.8 1.8

9 A 0.0 88 −3.6 5.4 −0.1 0.7 3.4
9 B −2.0 65 −4.1 9.5 −0.6 1.0 5.6
9 C −2.8 66 −3.1 7.8 −0.7 0.9 2.1

10 A −0.3 91 −1.7 7.7 −0.1 0.7 2.6
10 B −0.7 91 −6.7 7.9 −0.2 0.7 3.6
10 C −0.9 95 −2.3 7.5 −0.2 0.5 1.1