Table 5.

Logistic regression analysis of socio-demographic, reproductive and awareness of HIV positive status variables versus current practice of family planning among HIV infected fecund women

Independent variables	Current practice of any FP		Model 1 adjusted odds ratio (95 % CI)	Model 2 adjusted odds ratio (95 % CI)	Model 3 adjusted odds ratio (95 % CI)
	Yes	No
Education
No formal education	29	44	Reference	Reference	Reference
Primary	165	147	1.69(0.99,2.87)	1.53(0.87,2.68)	1.61(0.91,2.85)
Secondary & above	57	47	2.06(1.08,3.91)a	2.17(1.08,4.36)a	2.36(1.16,4.78)a
Marital status
Married/Cohabiting	190	161	1.51(1.00,2.26)a	1.17(0.76,1.81)	1.23(0.79,1.91)
Others	61	77	Reference	Reference	Reference
Region
Northern	67	42	Reference	Reference	Reference
Central	109	50	0.53(0.28,0.99)a	0.51(0.26,0.99)a	0.50(0.26,0.98)a
Southern	313	159	0.63(0.36,1.09)	0.71(0.40,1.27)	0.69(0.38,1.24)
Residence
Urban	127	60	0.74(0.48,1.14)	0.93(0.58,1.48)	0.92(0.57,1.48)
Rural	362	191	Reference	Reference	Reference
FP information from radio
Yes	170	148		1.06(0.71,1.60)	1.10(0.72,1.66)
No	81	90		Reference	Reference
Visited health facility past 12 months
Yes	207	167		1.52(0.96,2.41)	1.35(0.84,2.15)
No	44	71		Reference	Reference
Births in past 5 years
0	87	131		Reference	Reference
1	113	77		1.82(1.19,2.79)b	2.02(1.30,3.13)b
2 & more	51	30		2.03(1.15,3.56)a	2.20(1.24,3.91)b
No of living children
0	9	37		Reference	Reference
1–2	103	90		2.99(1.29,6.88)a	2.26(0.96,5.32)
3–4	85	73		3.16(1.33,7.48)b	2.60(1.08,6.28)a
5 & more	54	38		4.12(1.64,10.35)b	3.03(1.18,7.82)a
Knows HIV positive status
Yes	119	65			2.32(1.54,3.50)c
No	132	173			Reference
–2 Log likelihood of the constant			677.55	677.55	677.55
−2 Log likelihood of the model			662.49	628.55	611.54
Likelihood Ratio Chi2 (p-value)			15.06 (0.020)	48.99 (0.000)	66.01 (0.000)
Nagelkerke R2			0.040	0.127	0.168
Hosmer & Lemeshow Test Chi2 (p-value)			6.40 (0.494)	2.02 (0.980)	11.40 (0.180)

^aP < 0.05; ^bp < 0.01; ^cp < 0.001