Table 5. Reconstruction of 5-node synthetic Yeast IRMA network.
Switch on data | Switch off data | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method | PPV | Recall | F score | PPV | Recall | F score |
Broken stick | 0.40(0.5) | 0.67(0.67) | 0.50(0.57) | 0.67(0.67) | 0.33(0.33) | 0.44(0.44) |
Bartlett | 0.60(0.75) | 0.50(0.5) | 0.60(0.55) | 0.56(0.56) | 0.83(0.83) | 0.67(0.67) |
TSNI integral | 0.40(0.63) | 0.83(0.83) | 0.53(0.71) | 0.29(0.44) | 0.67(0.67) | 0.40(0.53) |
TSNI in Cantone et al. | - (1.00) | - (0.67) | - (0.80) | - (0.75) | - (0.50) | - (0.60) |
Broken stick, Bartlett’s and TSNI integral were evaluated on the dynamic data of Yeast 5 node synthetic IRMA network against TSNI performance reported in Cantone et al. 2009 [62]. Values in parentheses show the performance when self-regulation is not considered in the inference as in DREAM 3 challenge.