Skip to main content
. 2015 May 18;10(5):e0127364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127364

Table 5. Reconstruction of 5-node synthetic Yeast IRMA network.

Switch on data Switch off data
Method PPV Recall F score PPV Recall F score
Broken stick 0.40(0.5) 0.67(0.67) 0.50(0.57) 0.67(0.67) 0.33(0.33) 0.44(0.44)
Bartlett 0.60(0.75) 0.50(0.5) 0.60(0.55) 0.56(0.56) 0.83(0.83) 0.67(0.67)
TSNI integral 0.40(0.63) 0.83(0.83) 0.53(0.71) 0.29(0.44) 0.67(0.67) 0.40(0.53)
TSNI in Cantone et al. - (1.00) - (0.67) - (0.80) - (0.75) - (0.50) - (0.60)

Broken stick, Bartlett’s and TSNI integral were evaluated on the dynamic data of Yeast 5 node synthetic IRMA network against TSNI performance reported in Cantone et al. 2009 [62]. Values in parentheses show the performance when self-regulation is not considered in the inference as in DREAM 3 challenge.