Skip to main content
. 2015 May 8;15:37. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0036-3

Table 2.

Comparison of cystometric parameters and bladder weight between the experimental groups. The results of various cystometric parameters and bladder weight for group I (control), group II (BOO rats), and group III (BOO rats after 5-HMT administration) are shown

Group (n) TP-BP MP-BP MV MI MT NVA Bladder weight
I (20) 14.0 (a) ±0.97 55.4 (a) ±4.64 0.61 (a) ±0.06 64.7 (a) ±4.36 11.6 (a) ±1.33 0.15 (a) ±0.37 116.5 (a) ±8.26
II (26) 9.5 (b) ±6.95 55.2 (a) ±8.31 0.19 (b) ±0.05 27.4 (b) ±4.26 10.6 (b) ±0.85 2.36 (b) ±0.49 212.1 (b) ±12.00
III (25) 4.9 (c) ±3.51 49.24 (b) ±4.65 0.27 (c) ±0.64 39.3 (c) ±5.91 10.7 (b) ±1.45 1.31 (c) ±0.47 197.4 (c) ±10.66
p-value1) 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.017 0.000 0.000

TP, BP, MP: cmH2O; MV: mL; MT: seconds; bladder weight: mg; NVA (number/10 voidings)

The same letters indicate non-significant differences between groups based on Scheffe’s multiple comparison tests

1) Statistical significance among the different groups was tested by a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test