Skip to main content
. 2015 May 18;10(5):e0127318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127318

Table 1. Distribution of markers in serum of Lung Cancer patients and Controls, and efficacy in classifying Lung Cancer.

Marker Control/Case Median Range p a AUC (95% CI) b
HB-EGF (pg/mL) Control 196.50 32.00–4661.00 0.154 0.585 (0.435–0.755)
Healthy 174.50 65.00–1627.00
Benign 218.50 32.00–4661.00
LC 182.50 24.00–1823.00
EGF (pg/mL) Control 340.82 98.01–1160.42 <0.001 0.701 (0.525–0.853)
Healthy 247.61 98.01–659.01
Benign 404.76 102.04–1160.42
LC 577.18 55.97–1176.89
sEGFR (ng/mL) Control 34.13 20.82–49.57 0.037 0.619 (0.471–0.786)
Healthy 30.42 20.82–47.70
Benign 37.82 25.13–49.57
LC 37.54 21.90–97.40
sCD26 (ng/mL) Control 473.00 122.00–998.00 <0.001 0.711 (0.453–0.865)
Healthy 504.50 331.00–816.00
Benign 405.50 122.00–998.00
LC 358.50 136.00–1192.00
VEGF (pg/mL) Control 542.70 39.73–2631.56 0.055 0.600 (0.449–0.769)
Healthy 542.70 39.73–1178.40
Benign 541.29 124.94–2631.56
LC 619.99 81.54–1856.40
CAL (ng/mL) Control 129.44 33.13–421.23 <0.001 0.781 (0.627–0.916)
Healthy 116.55 39.16–274.70
Benign 141.93 33.13–421.23
LC 221.21 48.33–482.89

a Mann-Whitney U (two-sided test).

b AUC based on out-of-bag predictions (models are fitted in the training sets with the 75% of the cases and are subsequently used for predicting the group membership of the 25% test cases). Average values and percentile 95% CI over 1000 repetitions are provided.