Skip to main content
. 2015 May 18;10(5):e0127318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127318

Table 2. Distribution of markers in early and advanced NSCLC versus Controls.

Marker Control/ Case Median Range p a
HB-EGF (pg/mL) Control 196.50 32.00–4661.00
NSCLC
NSCLC I+II 159.00 56.00–435.00 0.630
NSCLC III+IV 190.00 24.00–1823.00 0.698
EGF (pg/mL) Control 340.82 98.01–1160.42
NSCLC
NSCLC I+II 792.82 388.23–1176.89 <0.001
NSCLC III+IV 477.74 144.23–1158.32 0.012
sEGFR (ng/mL) Control 34.13 20.82–49.57
NSCLC
NSCLC I+II 38.28 29.17–46.44 0.375
NSCLC III+IV 37.14 21.90–46.28 0.375
sCD26 (ng/mL) Control 473.00 122.00–998.00
NSCLC
NSCLC I+II 396.00 206.00–640.00 0.116
NSCLC III+IV 356.00 136.00–945.00 <0.001
VEGF (pg/mL) Control 542.70 39.73–2631.56
NSCLC
NSCLC I+II 469.86 227.00–1353.08 0.990
NSCLC III+IV 663.85 81.54–1856.40 0.028
CAL (ng/mL) Control 129.44 33.13–421.23
NSCLC
NSCLC I+II 196.16 120.73–426.99 0.002
NSCLC III+IV 247.06 107.71–482.89 <0.001

a Mann-Whitney U (two-sided test) for comparison among the control group and early and advanced NSCLC stages. P-values were corrected by the Holm method to prevent for inflation of the type I error due to multiple testing (corrections based on multiplicity given by controls subtypes and LC staging).