Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 7;25(6):433–438.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.01.018

Table 2.

Results from Sampling-Weighted, Multivariable-Adjusted Logistic Regression Models of Polypharmacy Associations

Exposures Sampling-Weighted Polypharmacy Model ORs (95% CI)
Crude (CI) Model 1* (CI) Model 2 (CI) Model 3 (CI)
Region Northeast Ref Ref Ref Ref
Midwest 1.04 (0.83–1.31) 1.07 (0.86–1.34) 1.03 (0.82–1.29) 1.01 (0.78–1.32)
West 1.08 (0.86–1.37) 1.08 (0.86–1.37) 1.14 (0.90–1.45) 1.23 (0.93–1.62)
South 1.61 (1.32–1.96) 1.59 (1.30–1.94) 1.51 (1.23–1.85) 1.48 (1.17–1.87)
Race White Ref Ref Ref Ref
Black 1.05 (0.96–1.15) 1.07 (0.97–1.18) 0.90 (0.81–1.00) 0.63 (0.55–0.72)
Gender Male Ref Ref Ref Ref
Female 1.55 (1.39–1.73) 1.50 (1.34–1.68) 1.35 (1.20–1.51) 1.94 (1.68–2.23)

Statistically Significant Estimates are Bolded

For model covariate possible values see Table 1

*

Adjusted for Demographics (Age, Race, Gender, Region)

Adjusted for Demographics + SES Factors (Education, Income)

Adjusted for Demographics + SES Factors + Comorbidities (Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension, Dyslipidemia, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease History)

CI: confidence interval

OR: odds ratio for being polypharmacy (≥ 8 total ingredients) positive

Ref: reference group