. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Mar 28;57:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.03.018

Table 3.

Expressed Emotion Group Comparisons

Group	Healthy Control	Ultra High-Risk	χ ²	p-value
Initial Statement Positive
Endorsed Frequency(%)	9(45%)	5(22%)	2.64	p = .05
Not Endorsed Frequency(%)	11(55%)	18(78%)
Criticism
Endorsed Frequency(%)	16(80%)	18(78%)	0.02	p = .44
Not Endorsed Frequency(%)	4(20%)	5(22%)
Emotional Over-Involvement
Endorsed Frequency(%)	12(60%)	14(61%)	0.003	p = .48
Not Endorsed Frequency(%)	8(40%)	9(39%)
Warmth
Endorsed Frequency(%)	20(100%)	21(91%)	1.82	p = .09
Not Endorsed Frequency(%)	0(0%)	2(9%)

Note: Chi-share tests were employed to examine group differences in the dichotomous (Y/N) EE variables from the Five Minute Speech Sample (FMSS).