Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Dual Diagn. 2015 Apr-Jun;11(2):107–117. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2015.1025013

Table 3.

Summary of Mediation Analysis on the Full Sample (5,000 bootstrap samples; n = 231) with Each DERS Subscale Tested Simultaneously while Adjusting for Negative Affect

Independent Variable (IV) Mediating variable (M) Dependent variable (DV) Coefficient SE 95% CI
PCL-S --- YAACQ .09 .10 [−.109, .297]
PCL-S IMPULSE YAACQ .05 .03 [.002, .111]*
PCL-S GOALS YAACQ .07 .02 [.028, .121]*
PCL-S NONACCEPT YAACQ .04 .03 [−.020, .109]
PCL-S CLARITY YAACQ .00 .01 [−.004, .031]
PCL-S STRATEGIES YAACQ −.09 .05 [−.195, .005]
PCL-S AWARE YAACQ .01 .01 [−.004, .025]

Note. CI = confidence interval; PCL-S = PTSD Checklist Stressor Specific; DERS = Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; YAACQ = Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire; IMPULSE = Impulse Control Difficulties; GOALS = Difficulties Engaging in Goal-Directed Behavior; NONACCEPT = Nonacceptance of Emotional Responses; CLARITY = Lack of Emotional Clarity; STRATEGIES = Limited Access to Emotion Regulation Strategies; AWARE = Lack of Emotional Awareness.

*

Statistical significance determined by confidence intervals excluding zero.