Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2015 Jan 28;137(3):638–645. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29429

Table II.

Associations between selected SNPs in the Hippo pathway genes and CM-specific survival

No.
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis*
Patients Death (%) HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
YAP1
rs11225163
 CC 342 49 (14.33) 1.00 1.00
 CT 394 36 (9.14) 0.63 (0.41–0.97) 0.035 0.55 (0.35–0.87) 0.010
 TT 122 10 (8.20) 0.51 (0.26–1.00) 0.051 0.59 (0.30–1.18) 0.135
 CT+TT 516 46 (8.91) 1.00 1.00
 CC 342 49 (14.33) 1.67 (1.12–2.50) 0.012 1.79 (1.18–2.72) 0.007
TEAD1
rs7944031
 AA 653 68 (10.41) 1.00 1.00
 AG 185 25 (13.51) 1.34 (0.85–2.12) 0.211 1.81 (1.13–2.92) 0.014
 GG 20 2 (10.00) 0.98 (0.24–4.00) 0.977 1.85 (0.45–7.56) 0.395
 AA 653 68 (10.41) 1.00 1.00
 AG+GG 205 27 (13.17) 1.31 (0.84–2.04) 0.243 1.82 (1.14–2.89) 0.012
TEAD4
rs1990330
 CC 473 41 (8.67) 1.00 1.00
 CA 332 46 (13.86) 1.60 (1.05–2.43) 0.029 1.51 (0.98–2.33) 0.065
 AA 53 8 (15.09) 1.74 (0.81–3.71) 0.154 1.95 (0.90–4.43) 0.090
 CC 473 41 (8.67) 1.00 1.00
 CA+AA 385 54 (14.03) 1.62 (1.08–2.43) 0.021 1.56 (1.03–2.38) 0.037

SNPs = single nucleotide polymorphisms; CM = cutaneous melanoma; HR = hazards ratio.

*

Adjusted for age, sex, tumor stage, Breslow thickness, SLNB, 0. level, ulceration of tumor and tumor cell mitotic rate in the Cox models.