Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 28;11(3):e267–e278. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.003673

Table A2.

Associations Between Physician Characteristics and Tumor Board Participation and Specific Tumor Board Features (adjusted)*

graphic file with name jop00315-3371-t0A2.jpg

Characteristic All Respondents
Tumor Board Participants Only
Tumor Board Participation (weekly v < weekly or never; n = 1,601)
Tumor Board Serves Treatment Planning Function (n = 1,465)
Tumor Board Includes Evaluation of Treatment Decisions (n = 1,464)
Tumor Board Reviews Only Challenging Patient Cases (n = 1,458)
Tumor Board Reviews Variety of Cancer Sites (n = 1,460)
Tumor Board Serves As Teaching Session (no case review; n = 1,454)
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Specialty
    Medical oncologist 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref
    Radiation oncologist 2.3 1.5 to 3.5 < .001 2.2 1.3 to 3.6 .003 2.9 1.5 to 5.6 .001 0.8 0.5 to 1.1 .15 2.3 1.3 to 4.0 .003 0.8 0.5 to 1.3 .34
    Cardiothoracic surgeon 0.3 0.2 to 0.4 < .001 1.3 0.7 to 2.5 .38 4.8 1.8 to 13.3 .002 0.6 0.4 to 1.0 .03 0.9 0.5 to 1.6 .74 0.7 0.3 to 1.4 .29
    Colorectal surgeon/surgical oncologist 0.6 0.3 to 0.9 .02 1.2 0.6 to 2.1 .63 4.2 1.4 to 12.4 .008 0.7 0.4 to 1.1 .09 1.2 0.6 to 2.2 .61 0.4 0.2 to 1.0 .046
    General surgeon 0.2 0.2 to 0.3 < .001 1.3 0.9 to 1.97 .13 2.9 1.7 to 5.1 < .001 0.6 0.4 to 0.8 .001 2.9 1.8 to 4.6 < .001 0.7 0.4 to 1.1 .10
Practice structure
    Hospital based 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref
    HMO 0.9 0.6 to 1.3 .54 1.3 0.8 to 2.0 .28 1.0 0.6 to 1.7 .92 1.8 1.3 to 2.5 .001 0.8 0.5 to 1.4 .44 0.7 0.4 to 1.2 .19
    VA or government 1.6 1.1 to 2.4 .03 2.4 1.3 to 4.2 .004 1.4 0.8 to 2.7 .27 1.1 0.8 to 1.5 .68 0.6 0.4 to 0.9 .02 0.8 0.5 to 1.4 .54
    Solo practice 0.4 0.2 to 0.6 < .001 0.7 0.4 to 1.1 .11 2.5 1.1 to 5.8 .03 1.2 0.8 to 1.9 .35 0.8 0.4 to 1.5 .43 1.4 0.8 to 2.5 .29
    Single-specialty group 0.7 0.5 to 0.9 .02 0.9 0.6 to 1.3 .49 3.4 1.7 to 7.0 .001 1.2 0.8 to 1.6 .33 1.0 0.6 to 1.7 .95 1.0 0.6 to 1.6 .99
    Multispecialty group 0.5 0.3 to 0.8 .003 0.7 0.4 to 1.2 .17 1.7 0.7 to 4.2 .22 1.3 0.8 to 2.2 .23 0.7 0.3 to 1.4 .28 1.6 0.8 to 2.9 .17
Teachers (medical students or residents)
    No 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref
    Yes 1.7 1.3 to 2.2 < .001 1.3 0.9 to 1.7 .11 1.0 0.7 to 1.6 .86 0.9 0.7 to 1.1 .32 0.5 0.3 to 0.8 .001 1.2 0.8 to 1.7 .37
NCI cancer center affiliation
    No 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref
    Yes 1.4 1.0 to 1.9 .03 1.3 0.9 to 1.9 .12 1.1 0.6 to 1.7 .84 1.2 0.9 to 1.6 .12 0.7 0.5 to 0.97 .03 1.4 0.9 to 2.0 .12
    Do not know 0.9 0.7 to 1.3 .70 1.0 0.7 to 1.5 .90 0.8 0.4 to 1.5 .50 1.4 1.0 to 1.9 .046 1.3 0.7 to 2.3 .35 1.2 0.7 to 2.0 .43

NOTE. Bold font indicates significance.

Abbreviations: HMO, health maintenance organization; NCI, National Cancer Institute; OR, odds ratio; Ref, referent; VA, Veterans Affairs.

*

Assessed via multivariable logistic regression. Outcome variables were tumor board features in each column, adjusting for all variables in rows of table, plus physician age, sex, reported No. of patients with lung cancer seen per month, and reported No. of patients with colorectal cancer seen per month.