Table 3.
PCP Preference for Timing and Updates of Care Plans and Perceived Facilitators and Barriers to Use of Care Plans

| Parameter | WREN Cohort: Sample Plan (n = 46)* (%) | UW Cohort: Personalized Plans (n = 26)* (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Need and timing for possible care plans updates | ||
| Never | 0 | 0 |
| After every oncology visit | 28 | 4 |
| Yearly | 24 | 27 |
| Every few years | 2 | 0 |
| Based on information changes, not time | 54 | 62 |
| Other | 9 | 8 |
| Best time to deliver care plan to PCP† | ||
| Immediately after cancer diagnosis | 9 | 0 |
| Immediately after primary treatment | 43 | 62 |
| 1-2 years after diagnosis | 0 | 4 |
| When patient discharged from oncology follow-up | 33 | 35 |
| Other | 15 | 4 |
| Endorsed facilitators of care plan use by PCP† | ||
| Increased awareness of existence | 87 | 81 |
| Routinely provided care plans for all | 85 | 73 |
| Standardized location | 89 | 88 |
| Care plan specific to primary care | 61 | 50 |
| Shorter care plan, with ideal length fill-in | 33 | 31 |
| Other (with fill-in) | 20 | 8 |
| Endorsed barriers to care plan use by PCP† | ||
| Content too generic | 26 | 23 |
| Plan difficult to understand | 28 | 12 |
| Plan too long | 67 | 54 |
| Not sure how to find it | 83 | 62 |
| Not located in patient chart | 74 | 65 |
| Don't know to look for it | 76 | 65 |
| Don't know that it exists | 85 | 81 |
| Plan disrupts clinical workflow | 26 | 23 |
| Follow-up care continues with oncologist | 24 | 19 |
Abbreviations: PCP, primary care provider; WREN, Wisconsin Research and Education Network; UW, University of Wisconsin.
Denominators for individual questions vary based on whether participants answered.
Participant instructed to select all that applied.