Table 4.

Included articles rating according to the PEDro scale [25].

		#1	#2	#3	#4	#5	#6	#7	#8	#9	#10	#11	Score
Articles on motor rehabilitation	Rasova et al. (2005) [26]	✓	✗	✗	✓	✗	✗	✗	✓	✓	✓	✓	6/11
	Ibrahim et al. (2011) [28]	✓	✗	✗	✗	✗	✗	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	6/11
	Tomassini et al. (2012) [20]	✓	✗	✗	✗	✗	✗	✗	✓	✓	N/A	✓	5/11
	Bonzano et al. (2014) [29]	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗	✗	✗	✓	✓	✓	✓	8/11
	Prosperini et al. (2014) [30]	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗	✗	✓	✗	✓	✓	✓	8/11
	Rasova et al. (2015) [31]	✓	✗	✗	✗	✗	✗	✗	✓	✓	✗	✓	4/11
Articles on cognitive rehabilitation	Penner and Kappos (2006) [32]	✓	✗	✗	✗	✗	✗	✗	✓	✓	N/A	✓	4/11
	Sastre-Garriga et al. (2011) [33]	✓	✗	✗	✗	✗	✗	✓	✓	✓	N/A	✓	5/11
	Chiaravalloti et al. (2012) [34]	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	10/11
	Ernst et al. (2012) [35]	✓	✗	✗	✗	✗	✗	✗	✓	✓	✓	✓	5/11
	Filippi et al. (2012) [36]	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗	✗	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	9/11
	Leavitt et al. (2012) [39]	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	10/11
	Cerasa et al. (2013) [37]	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	10/11
	Parisi et al. (2014) [38]	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗	✗	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	9/11
	Bonavita et al. (2015) [40]	✓	✗	✗	✓	✗	✗	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	7/11
	De Giglio et al. (2015) [41]	✓	✓	✓	✓	✗	✗	✓	✗	✓	✓	✓	7/11

N/A: data not available.

Criterion 1: specified eligibility criteria.

Criterion 2: randomized allocation.

Criterion 3: concealed allocation.

Criterion 4: similarity between groups at baseline.

Criterion 5: blinding of subjects.

Criterion 6: blinding of therapists.

Criterion 7: blinding of assessors.

Criterion 8: outcome measures obtained from at least 85% of initially allocated subjects.

Criterion 9: all received treatment, or key outcome, was analyzed by “intention-to-treat.”

Criterion 10: between-group statistical comparison.

Criterion 11: both point and variability measures provided.