Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 7;20(4):301–306. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2014.899578

Table 1.

Description of diagnostic approach for 20 patients seen spontaneously for a proctological problem versus the 133 patients for whom it was shown that there was a proctological problem after questioning:.

Patients coming spontaneously for a proctological problem (n = 20) n (%) Proctological problem after questioning (n = 133) n (%) P-valuea
Complaints
Bleeding 8 (40.0) 41 (30.8) 0.4
Pain 12 (60.0) 35 (26.3) 0.004
Anal lump 2 (10.0) 31 (23.3) 0.2
Anal discharge 4 (20.0) 18 (13.5) 0.5
Uncontrolled anal leakage 0 22 (16.5) 0.08
Constipation 4 (20.0) 47 (35.3) 0.2
Diarrhoea 1 (5.0) 11 (8.3) 1.0
Pruritus ani 8 (40.0) 26 (19.6) 0.08
Examinations
Examination of anal margin 16 (80.0) 75 (56.4) 0.05
Rectal examination 10 (50.0) 39 (29.3) 0.08
Anoscopy 2 (10.0) 1 (0.8) 0.045
Other clinical examination 4 (20.0) 2 (1.5) 0.003
At least one clinical examination in addition to questioning 18 (90.0) 79 (59.4) 0.01
Additional examinations 2 (10.0) 4 (3.0) 0.2
Diagnoses
Haemorrhoids 11 (55.0) 63 (47.4) 0.6
Anal fissure 4 (20.0) 10 (7.5) 0.09
Abscess and/or anal fistula 1 (5.0) 1 (0.8) 0.2
Dermatology disorder 2 (10.0) 9 (6.8) 0.6
Functional disorder 2 (10.0) 48 (36.1) 0.02
Tumour 0 0
Anorectal STI 0 0
Treatment
At least one treatment prescribed 19 (95.0) 97 (72.9) 0.046

aFisher's Exact test.