Table 1.
Indicators | *Model 1A: WHO capacity to pay approach | Model 1B: WHO capacity to pay approach | Model 2: OOP as percent of household income |
---|---|---|---|
Catastrophic 30 | 1441 [1.52%]2 (0.123)3 | 146 [1.55%] (0.123) | 1745 [18.46%] (0.388) |
Catastrophic 20 | 254 [2.69%] (0.162) | 255 [2.70%] (0.162) | 1860 [19.67%] (0.398) |
Catastrophic 15 | 383 [4.05%] (0.197) | 388 [4.11%] (0.198) | 1969 [20.83%] (0.406) |
Catastrophic 10 | 571 [6.04%] (0.238) | 575 [6.09%] (0.239) | 2155 [22.80%] (0.420) |
Catastrophic 05 | - | - | 2683 [28.38%] (0.451) |
Subsistence expenditure | {6439.4}4 (1400.4) | {6591.9} (1943.9) | - |
Mean capacity to pay | {11549.5} (12126.9) | {11513.6} (120049.2) | - |
Poor household | 644 [6.8%] (0.252) | 697 [7.37] (0.261) | - |
Notes: 1Indicates the number of households reporting the event. 2Placed in [..] is the percentage of households reporting CHE. 3Placed in (..) is the standard deviation. 4Placed in {..} is the mean of the stated row variable.
Models 1 is based on the Xu [1] procedure described in the text with varying level of household scale multiplier. *Model 1A uses household scale multiplier β = 0.41, and 45th – 55th percentile to compute subsistence expenditure. Model 1B household scale multiplier β = 0.56, and 45th – 55th percentile to compute subsistence expenditure.