Table 6.

Logistic regression with seeking advice outside home in the treatment for diarrhoea as the dependent variable

Independent variable	May 2011 pre-MNCHW interview (N=602)
	Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)	p value	Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)	p value
Local Government Area (LGA)1
Ife North LGA	2.6 (1.4-4.7)	0.003	2.0 (1.0-3.8)	0.042
Ola Oluwa LGA	2.7 (1.6-4.7)	<0.001	3.4 (1.9-6.1)	<0.001
Educational status2
Primary	0.9 (0.3-2.7)	0.853	0.9 (0.3-2.8)	0.868
≥Secondary	1.0 (0.4-2.7)	0.969	1.1 (0.4-3.2)	0.844
Age3	1.0 (1.0-1.1)	0.392	1.0 (1.0-1.1)	0.461
Number of under-five children3	1.0 (0.7-1.3)	0.740	1.0 (0.7-1.4)	0.981
MNCHW4
Both November 2010 and May 2011	0.6 (0.4-1.0)	0.042	0.6 (0.3-0.9)	0.029
Diarrhoea in the last 3 months5
Yes	0.8 (0.5-1.3)	0.437	0.7 (0.4-1.1)	0.136

¹LGA reference=Boripe LGA

²Education status reference=No education

³Age and number of under-five children are entered in the model as continuous variables

⁴MNCHW reference=Caregivers who attended the May 2011 MNCHW only

⁵Diarrhoea in the last 3 months reference=Caregivers with children who did not have diarrhoea in the last 3 months