Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 19.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2015 Apr 14;131(20):1741–1744. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016379

Table 1.

Comparison of randomized studies using xanthine oxidase inhibition in heart failure.

Author Heart failure
Population
Xanthine oxidase
inhibitor
Follow-
up in
weeks
Primary
Outcome
definition
Primary
outcome result
Givertz et al. 2015 253 with SUA >9.5 mg/dl with one more high risk marker Allopurinol 300–600 mg/day 24 Clinical status: Outcomes, medication change and patient global assessment. 13% improved in both allopurinol and placebo arms.
Greig et al. 2011 32 NYHA II–III Allopurinol 300 mg/day 4 6-minute walk test and oxidative stress markers No difference in 6-minute walk test and improved oxidative markers
Nasr et al. 2010 59 NYHA III–IV Allopurinol 300 mg/day 36 Composite endpoint: Global cardiac function and mortality/morbidity Allopurinol did not improve composite endpoint
Hare et al. 2008 405 with a median SUA of 7.8 mg/dl and NYHA III–IV Oxypurinol 600 mg/day 24 Clinical status: Outcomes, medication change, patient global assessment or NYHA 43% improved in the oxypurinol arm compared to 45% in the placebo arm. Improved primary outcome in patients with higher uric acid levels
Cingolani et al. 2006 60 NYHA II–III Oxypurinol 600 mg/day 4 Ejection fraction 4.7+/− 2.6 % higher EF between oxypurinol and placebo arms
Gavin et al. 2005 50 NYHA II–III Allopurinol 300 mg/day 12 Exercise stress test and 6 minute walk test No difference in exercise performance with a decrease in plasma BNP.

SUA: Serum uric acid, NYHA: New York Heart Association, EF: ejection fraction, BNP: Brain natriuretic peptide