Skip to main content
. 2015 May 20;11(5):e1004251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004251

Fig 4. Spatial localization of metapopulations close to extinction.

Fig 4

The metapopulation can persist in two different regimes: for small n e(1+σ 2), and therefore small λ, the leading eigenvector (i.e., that associated with λ) is highly heterogeneous (high Ψ, top left), while for large n e(1+σ 2), all patches have roughly the same eigenvector component (low Ψ, bottom left). When the metapopulation is close to extinction (middle column, λδ), the equilibrium values p i are well approximated by the eigenvector component w i. When the eigenvector is heterogeneous, the metapopulation is maintained by few patches with high probability of persistence (those with high w i). The interesting feature is that these patches are spatially localized, so that a small region of the landscape contributes disproportionately to persistence. This is not the case when λδ, in which case multiple eigenvectors influence p, resulting in an almost uniform distribution of the p i (right column).