Table 2. Awareness of different contraceptive methods.
Contraceptive method | Current user n = 721(%) | Current non usern = 280(%) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Combined oral contraception | 692 (96) | 266 (95) | 0,49 |
Copper intrauterine device | 495 (67) | 154 (58) | 0,007* |
Male condom | 447 (62) | 185 (66) | 0,24 |
Intra uterine hormonal system | 470 (64) | 142 (54) | 0,003* |
Implant | 444 (60) | 142 (54) | 0,05* |
Progestin only pill | 237 (32) | 63 (24) | 0,01* |
Progestin only injection | 224 (31) | 70 (25) | 0,06 |
Diaphragm | 202 (28) | 70 (25) | 0,34 |
Combined hormonal contraceptive vaginal ring | 93 (13) | 22 (8) | 0,057 |
Combined hormonal contraceptive patch | 80 (11) | 25 (9) | 0,36 |
Sterilization | 22 (3) | 6 (2) | 0,53 |
Coitus interruptus | 15 (2) | 8 (3) | 0,14 |
Intrauterine contraception | 23 (3) | 3 (1) | 0,07 |
Natural family planning | 15(2) | 2 (1) | 0,18 |
Emergency contraception | 14(2) | 5 (2) | 1 |
Other | 15(2) | 11 (4) | 0,11 |
P-value calculated by Fischer´s exact test,
*p-value of 0,05 or less. Women stated all methods they were aware of. Women who stated “intra uterine contraception” could not specify which kind of intrauterine contraception they were aware of.