Skip to main content
. 2015 May 20;10(5):e0126713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126713

Table 3. Regional graph partition comparisons.

Region Competing partition Q found Q competing 𝓢n ad
Canada adm1 0.584 0.549 0.566 0.418
USA adm1 0.463 0.439 0.615 0.377
combined USA adm1 0.451 0.439 0.632 0.423
South America adm0 0.684 0.629 0.725 0.522
EU adm0 0.668 0.66 0.742 0.749
combined EU adm0 0.663 0.660 0.775 0.804
Europe adm0 0.734 0.718 0.708 0.656
combined Europe adm0 0.720 0.718 0.742 0.707
Switzerland in Europe adm1 0.389 0.313 0.279 0.063
Germany and Turkey adm1 0.295 0.249 0.345 0.127
Former Yugoslavia adm0 0.521 0.513 0.707 0.711
UKNs = 650 adm1 0.366 0.160 0.454 0.227
UKNs = 650 adm2 0.366 0.246 0.579 0.172
Spain adm1 0.538 0.514 0.680 0.507
Spain adm2 0.538 0.497 0.645 0.332
France adm1 0.298 0.230 0.264 0.112
Germany adm1 0.264 0.234 0.234 0.189
SE Asia, China and Japan adm0 0.701 0.627 0.707 0.585
Japan adm1 0.192 0.166 0.406 0.184
India adm1 0.355 0.304 0.313 0.211
UKNs = 920 UKNs = 650 0.367 0.364 0.735 0.750
UKNs = 920 adm1 0.367 0.160 0.435 0.180
UKNs = 920 adm2 0.367 0.243 0.56 0.174
rewired UKNs = 650 adm1 0.009 0 0.001 0
rewired UKNs = 650 adm2 0.009 −0.001 0.057 0

Modularities of the found and of the competing partition of the same regional subgraph and their two measures of difference: normalized mutual information and adjusted Rand index. (combined refers to result mixed with partial second-level clustering. adm0 denotes the country-level, while adm1 and adm2 the corresponding first- and the second-level subnational administrative divisions, respectively.)