Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res. 2015 Mar 31;232(3):226–236. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.03.006

Table 3.

Mood and anxiety ratings in healthy control and participants with psychoses

Men Women

Characteristic Healthy control men (n=20) PSY men (n=16) Between-group comparisons t p Healthy control women (n=17) PSY women (n=16) Between-group comparisons t p

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
 Trait anxiety score 32.50 6.46 41.75 11.73 PSY>HC 3.12 .004 29.50 4.87 40.07 7.33 PSY>HC 4.76 0.00
  Pre-scan PSY>HC 3.19 .004
State anxiety score 29.50 7.76 37.43 6.68 28.76 7.57 32.94 8.55
  Post-scan 30.86 9.49 37.60 11.91 29.44 6.48 36.06 10.14 PSY>HC 2.62 0.04
 Change in state, pre- to post-scan 1.65 6.64 − 0.54 7.76 1.38 4.40 3.13 8.57

IAPS stimuli ratingsa
 Negative arousal 5.05 2.33 4.79 2.14 4.47 2.10 4.68 2.56
 Negative valence 7.35 1.05 7.29 1.55 7.47 1.42 7.79 1.59
a

STAI (Spielberger, 1983) rates anxiety-related statements using a 1 – 4 scale (“not at all” to “very much so”) with two subscales differentiating “trait” from “state” anxiety. After the fMRI scanning session, subjects rated a selection of the IAPS stimuli on valence and arousal using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) (Bradley et al., 1994). No significant sex by case interaction effects.