Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2014 Oct 9;74(4):1077–1085. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25484

Table 1.

Simulation and Patient Experimental Resultsa

SNR Conventional
Optimized
Dt (μm2/ms) SD fp (%) SD Dp (μm2/ms) SD Dt (μm2/ms) SD fp (%) SD Dp (μm2/ms) SD
Free 10 1.106 0.569 21.41 17.31 15.132 11.102 1.162 0.524 20.39 17.30 15.005 11.694
20 1.187 0.482 17.84 14.65 16.203 11.150 1.227 0.441 16.93 13.17 15.900 11.207
39.2 1.239 0.415 15.34 10.84 16.463 10.406 1.278 0.404 13.62 8.64 16.530 10.040
80 1.296 0.387 12.27 6.30 16.957 8.716 1.314 0.391 11.43 5.30 16.949 8.315
Exp. 1.01 0.397 28.40 15.99 8.67 4.258 1.088 0.390 24.89* 11.39 11.028 7.981
Segmented 10 1.365 0.610 7.89 16.81 17.700 8.865 1.377 0.615 6.00 20.59 15.583 8.822
20 1.375 0.459 8.13 8.92 19.041 8.883 1.353 0.454 8.61 10.24 16.734 8.924
39.2 1.360 0.406 8.58 5.14 19.723 8.239 1.339 0.410 9.44 5.99 17.840 8.527
80 1.362 0.394 8.61 3.55 20.569 6.546 1.339 0.391 9.56 3.80 18.159 7.267
Exp. 1.323 0.472 13.31* 5.05 15.31 9.634 1.195 0.471 16.83 9.06 13.183 6.529
a

Average values and standard deviation results from the different b-value selection and fitting methods at four levels of SNR and from patient experiments. Daggers represent significant differences between fitting methods free and segmented, while asterisks represent significant (P <0.05) differences between the different b-value selection.