. 2014 Dec 31;64(6):2129–2137. doi: 10.2337/db14-0745

Table 1.

Comparison of GC and uptake among experimental groups

Diet	Glucose concentration (mmol/L)	v₂ (pmol/islet/h)		v_net (pmol/islet/h)		v₂/v_net (%)
Diet	Glucose concentration (mmol/L)	WT	G6pc2 KO	WT	G6pc2 KO	WT	G6pc2 KO
CF	5	2.7 ± 0.4 (4)^A	0.1 ± 0.3 (4)	18 ± 1 (4)^A	14 ± 3 (4)^A	16 ± 4 (4)^A	2 ± 2 (4)
HFF	5	3.1 ± 0.1 (5)^A	0.1 ± 0.3 (5)	14 ± 2 (5)^A	14 ± 3 (5)^A	25 ± 3 (5)^A/B	0.5 ± 2 (5)
CF	11	11 ± 1 (5)^B	0.9 ± 0.3 (4)	28 ± 4 (5)^A/B	31 ± 5 (4)^A/B	40 ± 6 (5)^B	3 ± 1 (4)
HFF	11	14 ± 1 (7)^B	1.2 ± 0.4 (7)	45 ± 8 (7)^B	46 ± 9 (7)^B	35 ± 5 (7)^B	3 ± 1 (7)

Rate of v₂, v_net, and v₂/v_net results are reported as the mean ± SEM (number of incubations). In each column, groups were compared by ANOVA. If at least one mean value was significantly different, pairwise comparisons were performed by Tukey-Kramer test. Statistically separated groups are indicated by different letters (A and B).