Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 1;8(3):2852–2863.

Table 5.

Analyses of association of CAT gene polymorphisms with the risk of NIHL between workers with NIHL (+) and without NIHL (-) in the middle noise level exposure group (85~92 dB)

NCBI rs# Location Variant Genotype Frequency Allele-dose Dominant* Recessive#

without NIHL (-) with NIHL (+) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI)
rs208679 5’flanking A/G AA 170 (56.40) 72 (58.10) 0.89 1.03 (0.73~1.25) 0.83 1.07 (0.70~1.63) 0.83 0.90 (0.40~2.04)
AG 112 (37.00) 43 (34.70)
GG 20 (6.60) 9 (7.30)
rs10836233 5’flanking G/A GG 155 (51.30) 71 (57.30) 0.41 0.88 (0.64~1.23) 0.29 0.79 (0.52~1.20) 0.75 1.10 (0.58~2.06)
GA 113 (37.40) 38 (30.60)
AA 34 (11.30) 15 (12.10)
rs2300182 Intron1 T/A TT 203 (67.00) 88 (71.00) 0.36 0.79 (0.53~1.18) 0.49 0.83 (0.53~1.31) 0.25 0.37 (0.08~1.65)
TA 87 (28.70) 34 (27.40)
AA 13 (4.30) 2 (1.60)
rs769217 exon9 (synon) T/C TT 61 (20.10) 31 (37.10) 0.02 1.11 (0.82~1.49) 0.048 1.59 (1.02~2.48) 0.30 0.76 (0.46~1.24)
TC 160 (52.80) 47 (37.90)
CC 82 (27.10) 46 (25.00)
rs7104301 3’flanking A/G AA 173 (57.10) 69 (55.60) 0.18 0.85 (0.61~1.19) 0.83 0.94 (0.62~1.44) 0.08 0.49 (0.22~1.07)
AG 115 (38.00) 43 (34.70)
GG 15 (5.00) 12 (9.70)
rs7949972 3’flanking C/T CC 104 (34.30) 46 (37.10) 0.75 1.03 (0.76~1.38) 0.58 1.16 (0.75~1.79) 0.69 0.89 (0.53~1.50)
CT 140 (46.20) 52 (41.90)
TT 59 (19.50) 26 (21.00)
*

Dominant effect = variant homozygotes + heterozygotes versus wild-type homozygotes;

#

Recessive effect = variant homozygotes versus heterozygotes + wild-type homozygotes.