Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 20;50(5):711–726. doi: 10.1002/jms.3590

Table 1.

Summary of theoretical collision cross section of [(dTGGGGT)4 + 3NH4]5− replica 1: average values with standard deviations (ΩCALC, reported in Å2); average percent difference between experimental and theoretical CCS (<%diff> = <[(ΩCALC- ΩEXP) /ΩEXP]x100%>); and computer time required per structure calculation (time, expressed in minutes); n. a. stands for not acquired

Method Algorithm ΩCALC <%diff> Time (min)
Trajectory method mobcal 810 ± 12 2.8% ∼10
Mobcal-He 788 ± 7 0% ∼1080
Mobcal-He25 788 ± 14 0% ∼35
Mobcal-N2 n. a. n. a. ∼40320
Mobcal-N25 n. a. n. a. ∼25920
Mobcal-N2-mod n. a. n. a. ∼11520
Mobcal-N25-mod 1004 ± 15 −0.6% ∼360
Exact hard sphere scattering mobcal 813 ± 8 3.2% ∼10
Mobcal-He 813 ± 8 3.2% ∼1080
Mobcal-He25 813 ± 8 3.2% ∼35
EHSSrot 816 ± 8 3.5% ∼1
EHSSrot-Siu 789 ± 7 0.1% ∼1
Projection approximation mobcal 687 ± 6 −12.8% ∼10
Mobcal-He 687 ± 6 −12.8% ∼1080
Mobcal-He25 687 ± 6 −12.8% ∼35
Projection superposition approximation He 781 ± 14 −0.9% ∼15
N2 941 ± 17 −6.8% ∼15