Table 2.
The associations between acetabular over-coverage measures and obesity measures
| Total population (n = 141) | Males (n = 62) | Females (n = 79) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analyses | P | Multivariate analyses | P | Multivariate analyses | P | Multivariate analyses | P | |
| Acetabular depth | ||||||||
| 2009-2010 | ||||||||
| BMI (kg/m2)a | 0.05 (-0.03, -0.14) | 0.20 | 0.22 (0.05, 0.38) | <0.01 | 0.17 (-0.18, 0.52) | 0.33 | 0.27 (0.09, 0.46) | <0.01 |
| Weight (kg)b | -0.01 (-0.04, 0.02) | 0.47 | 0.08 (0.02, 0.14) | 0.01 | 0.05 (-0.06, 0.16) | 0.36 | 0.10 (-0.03, -0.18) | <0.01 |
| Change (1990-1994 to 2009-2010) | ||||||||
| Percentage weight gainc | 0.06 (0.01, 0.10) | <0.01 | 0.06 (0.01, 0.10) | <0.01 | 0.05 (-0.05, 0.14) | 0.32 | 0.07 (0.02, 0.11) | <0.01 |
| Lateral centre edge angle | ||||||||
| 2009-2010 | ||||||||
| BMI (kg/m2)a | 0.18 (-0.06, 0.41) | 0.14 | 0.69 (0.22, 1.16) | <0.01 | 0.39 (00.41, 1.19) | 0.33 | 0.59 (0.02, 1.17) | 0.04 |
| Weight (kg)b | 0.01 (-0.07, 0.08) | 0.81 | 0.23 (0.06, 0.40) | <0.01 | 0.11 (-0.15, 0.37) | 0.40 | 0.22 (-0.01, 0.44) | 0.06 |
| Change (1990-1994 to 2009-2010) | ||||||||
| Percentage weight gainc | 0.16 (0.05, 0.28) | <0.01 | 0.16 (0.04, 0.28) | 0.01 | 0.09 (-0.13, 0.31) | 0.40 | 0.15 (0.00, 0.29) | 0.04 |
Results are expressed as β (95% confidence interval). aMultivariate analysis adjusted for gender (for total population analyses), age at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and body mass index (BMI) at 1990-1994. bMultivariate analysis adjusted for gender (for total population analyses), age at MRI and weight at 1990-1994. cMultivariate analysis adjusted for gender (for total population analyses), and age at MRI.