Table 1.

Prevalence of malaria detected by RDT and LAMP

	RDT	LAMP
Overall prevalence (%; CI 95 %a)	0.5; 0.1-0.8	1.6; 1.1-2.2
	19/3983	65/3983
Relative proportion positive in:
Only Panb (%; CI 95 %)	5.3; 0.0-16.4	35.4; 23.4-47.4
	1/19	23/65
Pan + P. falciparum c (%; CI 95 %)	31.6; 8.5-54.6	64.6; 52.6-76.6
	6/19	42/65
Only P. falciparum d (%; CI 95 %)	63.2; 39.2-87.1	NDe
	12/19

Both RDT brands used for malaria screening are two-band RDTs detecting P. falciparum HRP2 and Pan-Plasmodium LDH simultaneously, although with different detection limits (50–100 parasites/μL for P. falciparum HRP2 and 200–500 parasites/μL for Pan-Plasmodium LDH). In contrast, only the Pan-LAMP positive samples were assessed for P. falciparum during the LAMP screening, with a detection limit of 2–5 parasites/μL for both Pan-Plasmodium and P. falciparum

^aConfidence intervals for prevalences were calculated using the survey [svy] command in Stata, accounting for household and village sampling/stratification

^bPositive for Plasmodium genus only

^cPositive for Plasmodium and P. falciparum

^dPositive for P. falciparum only

^eND = not determined