Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan;1(1):29–42. doi: 10.1177/1947603509358721

Table 2.

Quantitative Evaluation of Repair Tissue Formation at Treated Cartilage Defects, Controls, and Cartilage Thickness at Remote Area Specimens

Femoral Condyle Trochlear Groove
Remote area specimens 1,125 ± 290 667 ± 160
Control group 302 ± 205 212 ± 121
MACT I/III 510 ± 161 387 ± 178
MACT II 335 304 ± 128
MF 310 ± 126 268 ± 196
AMIC I/III 645 ± 308 408 ± 148
AMIC II 393 ± 144 310 ± 125

Note: The mean tissue thickness was calculated from 3 repeated measurements of the distance from tidemark to surface. The values in micrometers are depicted as means and standard deviations. Significant more repair tissue was induced when using a collagen I/III matrix was used compared with controls and MF (P < 0.05).