Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 16;27(8):990–994. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1020281

Table 1. Methods of data collection.

Data collection method Purpose Sample
Client flow To determine infrastructural barriers to PITC uptake 1 clinic, 1 intermediate referral hospital, 1 district hospital and 1 health centre
Register review To document uptake of PITC after attending a facility for other reasons All patient visits recorded in available patient registers on selected day, n = 728
FGDs To explore provider perceptions of PITC delivery 5 FGDs – nurses from all sites, n = 29: 12 registered, 17 enrolled (1 male; 2 nurses participated in both IDIs and FGDs)
IDIs To explore client flow and provider perceptions of PITC 14 nurses: 9 registered, 5 enrolled (2 males); 4 CCs (1 male)
KIIs To understand policy-maker perceptions of PITC Programme managers and quality assurance officers within the MoHSS, HIV programme donors, implementing partners, and training and laboratory institutions, n = 11 (5 males)

Note: All data collection was completed by T. Davyduke; topic guides were used for all interviews/discussions.

FGD, focus group discussion; IDI, in-depth interview; and KII, key informant interview.