Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Qual Life Res. 2014 Nov 21;24(6):1443–1453. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0861-y

Table 3.

Difference in Mean Self-Rated Health and Proportion in Fair or Poor Health across Response Option Order Experimental Factor and Experimental Treatments, TESS 2013

Factor 1 Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3 Treatment 4


“Excellent” to “Poor” “Poor” to “Excellent” “Excellent” to “Poor” and First “Excellent” to “Poor” and Last “Poor” to “Excellent” and First “Poor” to “Excellent” and Last
Mean self-rated health (5=excellent-1=poor) 3.39 3.30* 3.43 3.34 3.29** 3.30*
Mean self-rated health (Krosnick scale values) 72.64 71.57 73.34 71.92 71.68* 71.46*
Mean self-rated health (Perneger et al. scale values) 3.83 3.74* 3.89 3.77* 3.75** 3.73**
Proportion in “fair” or “poor” health 0.16 0.18 0.14 0.19** 0.17 0.19**

Notes

TESS: Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences

Tests of differences in means or proportion across response option order experimental factor or comparing treatments 2–4 to treatment 1:

*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001