Table 3.
Difference in Mean Self-Rated Health and Proportion in Fair or Poor Health across Response Option Order Experimental Factor and Experimental Treatments, TESS 2013
Factor 1 | Treatment 1 | Treatment 2 | Treatment 3 | Treatment 4 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
“Excellent” to “Poor” | “Poor” to “Excellent” | “Excellent” to “Poor” and First | “Excellent” to “Poor” and Last | “Poor” to “Excellent” and First | “Poor” to “Excellent” and Last | |
Mean self-rated health (5=excellent-1=poor) | 3.39 | 3.30* | 3.43 | 3.34 | 3.29** | 3.30* |
Mean self-rated health (Krosnick scale values) | 72.64 | 71.57 | 73.34 | 71.92 | 71.68* | 71.46* |
Mean self-rated health (Perneger et al. scale values) | 3.83 | 3.74* | 3.89 | 3.77* | 3.75** | 3.73** |
Proportion in “fair” or “poor” health | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.19** | 0.17 | 0.19** |
Notes
TESS: Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences
Tests of differences in means or proportion across response option order experimental factor or comparing treatments 2–4 to treatment 1:
p<.05,
p<.01,
p<.001