Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar 7;74(6):1065–1071. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204011

Table 3.

Absolute incidence rates (IRs) and pairwise comparison of each biologic* to every other for subsequent hospitalized infection. Data shown are adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Biologies Referent Group
Infliximab Adalimumab Etanercept Rituximab Abatacept
Crude IR Per 100 years (n/pys) 33.8 (1,382/4,087) 34.9 (497/1,423) 36.1 (661/1,831) 28.5 (38/133) 26.5 (88/333)
Adjusted HR (95% CI)
Abatacept 0.80 (0.64-0.99) 0.88 (0.68-1.12) 0.97 (0.76-1.23) 0.93 (0.64-1.36) 1.0 (Ref)
Rituximab 0.87 (0.63-1.20) 0.94 (0.67-1.32) 1.04 (0.74-1.46) 1.0 (Ref)
Etanercept 0.83 (0.72-0.97) 0.91 (0.76-1.08) 1.0 (Ref)
Adalimumab 0.92 (0.79-1.09) 1.0 (Ref)
Infliximab 1.0 (Ref)
*

Biologic exposure was defined as the days' supply from filled prescriptions or assigned days' supply based on recommended dosing frequency, plus a 30-day 'extension' period to each exposure.

Person years

Adjusted for the decile of disease risk score, specific anti-TNF biologic at the time of the index hospitalization, steroid use during baseline, methotrexate use during baseline, infection type for the index hospitalization, and coexisting medication exposures during follow up.