Skip to main content
. 2015 May;137(5):2811–2822. doi: 10.1121/1.4919316

TABLE II.

Outcomes of ANOVAs performed on word recognition scores. Analyses were performed separately for each SNR presented to children with NH. Type of sentence context = low or high, processing condition = speech in noise or sine wave, group = NH or CI.

NH −3 dB (df = 1, 64) NH 0 dB (df = 1, 68)
F p η2 F p η2
Main effects
 Type of sentence context 993.98 <0.001 0.940 1458.44 <0.001 0.955
 Processing condition 56.16 <0.001 0.467 NS NS
 Group 31.04 <0.001 0.327 78.71 <0.001 0.537
Two-way interactions
 Context × processing 114.43 <0.001 0.641 200.89 <0.001 0.747
 Context × group NS NS NS NS
 Processing × group 71.67 <0.001 0.528 264.98 <0.001 0.796
Three-way interaction
 Context × processing × group NS NS NS NS