Table 4.
Required WTP Values (for an Additional CRC Screening-Compliant Individual) at Specified Probabilities of Cost-Effectivenessa
| Assisted vs. Automated | Navigated vs. Automated | Navigated vs. Assisted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probability of being cost-effective | 80% | 95% | 80% | 95% | 80% | 95% |
| Overall | $693 | $1,057 | $589 | $725 | $769 | $1,154 |
| Age | ||||||
| 50–64 | $715 | $1,064 | $594 | $728 | $778 | $1,217 |
| 65–73 | N/A | N/A | $810 | N/A | $1,131 | N/A |
| Any prior CRC testing | ||||||
| No | $738 | $1,473 | $521 | $661 | $650 | $981 |
| Yes | $975 | $2,036 | $804 | $1,100 | $1,571 | N/A |
| First-degree family history of CRC | ||||||
| No | $718 | $1,090 | $576 | $710 | $726 | $1,122 |
| Yes | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
a
The “Automated” intervention is cost saving relative to usual care at any willingness to pay value.
WTP, willingness to pay; CRC, colorectal cancer; N/A, Specified probability of cost-effectiveness never reached