Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 31;17(3):e25637. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.25637

Table 2. Comparison of Healing Status and Pain Between the Study Groups at Different Time Points a, b, c.

Healing Status (REEDA Scale, 0-15) Pain (VAS, 0-10)
Group Baseline (5 ± 1) d after intervention (10 ± 1)d after delivery Baseline (5 ± 1) d after intervention (10 ± 1)d after delivery
Horsetail 5.0 ±1.6 2.9 ± 1.4 0.8 ± 1.3 5.7 ± 2.4 4.9±2.4 0.8±1.7
Placebo 4.1 ± 1.6 4.0 ± 1.4 3.5 ± 1.6 5.3 ± 2.2 7.1±2.4 4.6±2.6
Mean difference (95% CI) 0.9 (0.3 to 1.6) –1.1(–1.7- –0.6) –2.6 (-3.2- –2.1) 0.4(–0.5-1.3) –2.3(–3.2- –1.3) –3.8(–4.7-–3.0)
P Value 0.003 ţ d P < 0.001 P < 0.001 0.526 ≠ e P < 0.001 P < 0.001

aAbbreviations: VAS, visual analogue scale; REEDA, redness edema ecchymosis discharge approximation; CI, confidence interval.

bData indicate Mean ± Standard Deviation.

cNumber of participants was 54 in each group at baseline and (5 ± 1) after intervention, and (10 ± 1) after intervention 54 in each group for pain score and 53 in each group for pain score; for REEDA score Mean difference for the baseline comparison and (5 ± 1) after intervention using independent t-test.

d≠: means whitney

eţ: Independent t-test.