Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;27(1):91–108. doi: 10.1177/1079063214561684

Table 4.

Incremental Validity of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF Over the ERASOR for Nonsexual Recidivism.

B SE Wald df p Exp(B) 95% CI −2 log likelihood
Step 1 484.981
 ERASOR total score −.016 .018 0.705 1 .401 0.985 [0.950, 1.021]
Step 2 484.433
 ERASOR total score −.022 .020 1.137 1 .286 0.979 [0.940, 1.018]
 DASH-13 total score −.046 .062 0.558 1 .455 0.955 [0.845, 1.078]
Step 1 484.981
 ERASOR total score −.016 .018 0.705 1 .401 0.985 [0.950, 1.021]
Step 2 483.648
 ERASOR total score −.019 .019 1.034 1 .309 0.981 [0.945, 1.018]
 SAPROF total score −.044 .039 1.305 1 .253 0.957 [0.887, 1.032]

Note. DASH = Desistence for Adolescents Who Sexually Harm; SAPROF = Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk; ERASOR = Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism.

*

p < .05.