Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;42(12):1438–1445.

Table 3:

Checklist for evaluating an accreditation standard

Criteria Standards Ability
(Frequenards & Percent)
Yes No Partially
1 Does it focus on the patients or clients receiving the care or services? 43(93) 0 3(7)
2 Does it have face validity and demonstrated reliability? 41(89) 0 5(11)
3 Does it address the performance of common or important functions of a health care organization, such as patient management, leadership, infection control, and management of human resources? 46(100) 0 0
4 Do experts believe it to be important to practice or in improving 45(98) 0 1(2)
health outcomes?
5 Is it amenable to assessment and quantification through an internal or external evaluation process? 46(100) 0 0
6 Can it be uniformly applied to all organizations of a particular type, such as a hospital or clinic? 43(94) 1(2) 2(4)
7 Is it consistent with existing laws and regulations? 40(87) 2(4) 4(9)
8 Does it complement any existing international standards, such as those published by the World Health Organization? 46(100) 0 0
9 Is it culturally sensitive and appropriate? 43(94) 1(2) 2(4)
10 Does it reflect what experts consider “best practices”? 45(98) 0 1(2)
11 Does it provide a framework for the inclusion of advances in clinical practice or technology? 40(86) 3(7) 3(7)
12 Is it flexible enough to be revised as needed? 46(100) 0 0